If you are in a serious accident in Schaumburg, the insurance company might agree their policyholder caused the crash but still argue that your injuries are not as severe as you say. This often happens after accidents on busy roads like Golf Road, Higgins Road, Roselle Road, Barrington Road, Interstate 90, and others in Schaumburg and nearby suburbs. The insurer may question the amount of treatment you received, whether your symptoms are ongoing, or if the accident caused all your medical issues. These disagreements can lower your settlement offer, even when it is clear who was at fault. When I represent someone who is injured, I work to show not just who caused the accident, but also the real physical, financial, and personal impact of the injuries.
An insurer can admit that its policyholder caused an accident while still challenging the amount of compensation you should receive. This is an important distinction because proving negligence does not automatically establish the value of your damages.
For example, the insurer might agree you were rear-ended but claim the crash was too minor to cause a herniated disc, concussion, chronic pain, or other serious injuries. They might also say you recovered more quickly than your doctors or medical records show.
I approach these disputes by separating the issues of liability, medical causation, treatment, prognosis, and damages. Each element may require different evidence.
Your medical documentation is often one of the most important parts of an injury claim. Emergency room records, diagnostic imaging, physician examinations, physical therapy notes, surgical records, prescriptions, and specialist evaluations can help establish the nature and extent of an injury.
Insurance adjusters frequently scrutinize these records for anything they believe supports a lower settlement. They may point to normal X-rays, periods when pain levels improved, missed appointments, or medical notes stating that certain symptoms were improving.
I look at the medical record as a whole rather than allowing isolated statements to define the claim. Someone can experience periods of improvement while still suffering a substantial injury that interferes with employment, sleep, mobility, recreation, and ordinary daily activities.
Insurance companies often pay attention to gaps in your medical care. If you go several weeks between appointments, the adjuster might say your injuries were not serious enough to need ongoing treatment.
There can be legitimate reasons for a treatment interruption. You may have difficulty getting an appointment, lack transportation, need to return to work, experience insurance problems, or be following instructions to manage the injury at home.
When I review a claim with a treatment gap, I look for the reason behind it and check if the medical evidence still links your symptoms to the accident. A gap does not ruin your case, but it is something we need to explain.
An insurance company might look at your old medical records and claim your symptoms were there before the Schaumburg accident. They often focus on things like back problems, disc disease, arthritis, past surgeries, old sports injuries, or earlier car accidents.
A previous condition does not necessarily prevent you from recovering damages. A collision can aggravate an existing injury or turn a manageable medical condition into one that causes substantially greater pain and limitations.
I may compare your medical condition before and after the accident. Prior records can sometimes strengthen the claim by showing that you were functioning normally or experiencing fewer symptoms before the collision.
Insurance companies may also compare what you say about your limitations with photographs, videos, online posts, or other evidence. A photograph showing you attending an event or performing an ordinary activity can be presented out of context in an effort to suggest that your injuries are less significant than reported.
That does not mean an injured person must remain at home or stop living normally. People with legitimate injuries often have good days and bad days. The issue is whether the evidence accurately reflects your physical abilities and limitations over time.
I advise clients to be truthful and consistent when discussing symptoms, restrictions, medical treatment, employment limitations, and daily activities.
If a personal injury lawsuit is filed, the defense may seek an examination concerning the physical or mental condition placed at issue in the case. Illinois Supreme Court Rule 215 addresses physical and mental examinations of parties and other persons during litigation.
This type of examination should not be confused with treatment from your own doctor. The examining professional may have been selected as part of the defense’s litigation strategy, and the findings may later be used to challenge diagnosis, causation, treatment, disability, or prognosis.
I prepare for these issues carefully because a disagreement between medical professionals can become an important part of a contested injury case.
Insurance companies may dispute not only the severity of your injuries but also whether you contributed to causing the accident. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, Illinois uses modified comparative negligence. If you are found more than 50 percent responsible for the injury, you cannot recover damages. If your share of responsibility is 50 percent or less, your damages can be reduced according to your percentage of fault.
The insurer may therefore challenge both fault and damages as part of the same claim. I examine police reports, photographs, witness statements, medical evidence, vehicle damage, available video, and other information to address those arguments.
An injury claim involves more than the initial emergency room bill. Depending on the facts, damages may involve additional medical treatment, rehabilitation, lost wages, diminished earning ability, pain and suffering, disability, and other consequences.
Illinois law recognizes both economic and non-economic damages in personal injury litigation. The Code of Civil Procedure identifies non-economic losses as including matters such as pain and suffering, disability, and disfigurement.
When an insurer claims that your injuries are minor, detailed evidence showing how the injury has actually affected your work, mobility, family responsibilities, sleep, and everyday activities can become especially important.
The amount the insurer pays frequently depends on the severity, duration, and consequences of your injuries. Challenging those factors may allow an insurer to argue for a substantially lower settlement.
An adjuster may claim that your treatment was excessive, your recovery should have occurred sooner, diagnostic findings are minor, your symptoms came from another cause, or the accident was not severe enough to produce your reported injuries. I evaluate those arguments against the complete medical record, accident evidence, and the effect the injury has had on your life.
Yes. Prior medical conditions are frequently raised in personal injury claims. The insurer may obtain earlier medical records and compare them with your post-accident treatment.
However, having a previous condition does not automatically prevent recovery. If the collision aggravated or worsened an existing medical problem, that additional harm may still be relevant to your claim. The medical evidence often becomes especially important in distinguishing your pre-accident condition from the symptoms and limitations you experienced afterward.
Imaging is important, but it is not the only evidence used to evaluate an injury. Some painful and disabling conditions are not fully reflected by a single X-ray, MRI, CT scan, or other diagnostic test.
Physicians may also consider physical examinations, neurological findings, symptoms, range-of-motion limitations, treatment response, and other medical information. I look at the entire medical history rather than allowing one test result to determine whether an injury is legitimate or serious.
Potentially. Photos, videos, location information, comments, and posts may be reviewed and used to argue that your physical activity is inconsistent with what you reported about your injuries.
A single photograph does not necessarily show how you felt before or after an activity, whether you needed assistance, or whether the activity increased your symptoms later. Even so, I advise injured clients to assume that publicly available information could eventually be reviewed by an insurance company or defense attorney.
When an insurance company disputes the severity of your injuries, the case can become much more complicated than simply proving who caused the accident. Medical records, diagnostic testing, treatment history, prior health conditions, employment records, witness testimony, and evidence showing how the injury affects your daily activities can all become important.
At SJ INJURY LAW, I represent accident victims in Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, Des Plaines, Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect, Northbrook, Palatine, Rolling Meadows, Prospect Heights, Wheeling, Park Ridge, Rosemont, and Glenview, as well as Chicago and communities throughout Illinois.
If an insurance company is minimizing your injuries, questioning your medical treatment, blaming your symptoms on a previous condition, or offering substantially less than you believe your claim is worth, speak with SJ INJURY LAW. Contact our Schaumburg car accident attorney at SJ INJURY LAW by calling (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.