After a car accident in Schaumburg, it is common for the other driver’s insurance company to contact you quickly and ask for a recorded statement about what happened. The request may sound routine, especially if the adjuster is friendly and says the company only needs a few details before processing the claim. However, a recorded statement can become an important part of the insurance company’s investigation of fault, your injuries, and the amount it may eventually offer to resolve your claim.
Drivers injured on Schaumburg Road, Golf Road, Higgins Road, Roselle Road, Barrington Road, Route 53, or other busy roads in the northwest suburbs may receive this call before they fully understand their injuries or have had time to review the accident carefully. When the request comes from the other driver’s insurance company, I generally want my client to understand why the statement is being requested before answering recorded questions.
There is an important difference between making a claim with your own insurance company and making a claim against another driver’s insurer. The Illinois Department of Insurance explains that a first-party claim involves your own insurer and the insurance contract between you and that company. A third-party claim is different because you do not have a direct insurance contract with the other driver’s carrier, and that insurer’s primary obligation is to its own policyholder.
That distinction matters when an adjuster asks you to provide a recorded statement. The Illinois Department of Insurance states that there is no law establishing a specific list of information a third-party claimant must provide, although the insurance company will need enough information to investigate responsibility, damages, and whether the injuries are related to the collision.
I do not assume that a request for a recorded statement is automatically required simply because an adjuster asks for one.
An insurance company needs information before deciding whether its insured is responsible for an accident and how much a claim may be worth. The adjuster may ask about the intersection where the crash happened, which direction you were traveling, your speed, traffic signals, braking, lane changes, distractions, and what you remember immediately before impact.
Questions may then turn to your physical condition. You may be asked when pain began, whether you went to the emergency room, whether you had previous injuries, which body parts hurt, and whether you have returned to work.
The concern is timing. Many accident victims do not yet know the full extent of their injuries when the insurance company first calls. Back pain may worsen several days later. An MRI may eventually reveal a herniated disc. A shoulder injury may not be diagnosed until an orthopedic evaluation. A concussion may produce symptoms that were not obvious immediately after the collision.
A statement given too early may therefore provide an incomplete picture of what you are experiencing.
Human memory is not perfect following a stressful collision. You may estimate how fast you were traveling, say you did not see the other vehicle until impact, or initially forget a detail that becomes clearer after reviewing photographs or the police report.
The insurance company may later compare those statements with other evidence. If there are differences, the adjuster may argue that your version of the accident changed.
The same issue can arise with injuries. Suppose you initially report neck and shoulder pain. Several days later, you begin experiencing numbness in your hand and are diagnosed with a cervical disc injury. The insurer may point to the recorded statement and argue that you did not mention the neurological symptoms during the first call.
That does not necessarily mean the later symptoms are unrelated to the crash, but it may create another dispute that must be addressed.
Illinois uses modified comparative negligence. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, an injured person whose fault is more than 50 percent of the proximate cause of the injury generally cannot recover damages. If the injured person is 50 percent or less at fault, compensation may be reduced according to the percentage of fault assigned. The Illinois Department of Insurance also explains this rule in its guidance concerning claims against another driver’s insurance company.
Because percentages of fault can directly affect how much an insurer may owe, seemingly minor answers can matter. An adjuster may ask whether you were looking at your GPS, how far you were from the other vehicle when you first saw it, whether you could have stopped sooner, or whether you were exceeding the speed limit.
I want those questions considered carefully rather than answered casually during an unexpected telephone call.
The analysis can change when your own insurance company requests information. Your auto insurance policy is a contract, and it may contain cooperation requirements relating to investigation of a claim.
Illinois insurance regulations recognize that some insurance contracts may authorize sworn statements, examinations under oath, or similar procedures. For that reason, I do not advise someone to simply ignore a request from their own insurance carrier without first reviewing the applicable policy and the reason for the request.
This distinction is especially important in uninsured motorist, underinsured motorist, collision, or other first-party claims. The obligations you may have toward your own company are not necessarily the same as the obligations you have toward the insurance company representing the driver who injured you.
Declining an immediate recorded statement does not mean refusing to cooperate with the legitimate investigation of a third-party claim. The insurer still needs information about the accident, your injuries, medical treatment, vehicle damage, lost income, and other losses.
Illinois law also regulates certain insurance claim practices. For example, insurers are expected to conduct reasonable investigations based on available information and may not engage in certain improper claim-handling practices.
The goal is to provide accurate information in a manner that protects the integrity of your claim. Depending on the circumstances, information may be provided through documents, medical records, written communications, photographs, the crash report, or communication through an attorney.
There is generally an important distinction between providing information necessary to support your claim and agreeing to an insurer’s request for a recorded interview. The Illinois Department of Insurance states that no law sets out a specific list of information a third-party claimant must provide. The insurer does, however, need information to evaluate fault, damages, and whether your injuries resulted from the accident. Before agreeing to a recorded conversation, I want to understand what the insurer is requesting, why it wants the statement, and whether providing the information another way would be more appropriate.
The adjuster may ask about where the crash occurred, traffic conditions, speed, traffic signals, lane position, braking, distractions, weather, vehicle damage, and what you did immediately before the collision. You may also be questioned about medical treatment, prior accidents, previous injuries, pain levels, missed work, and whether your symptoms are improving. Some of these questions can directly affect disputes involving liability or medical causation, which is why careful and accurate answers are important.
Giving a statement does not automatically destroy an injury claim. If you have already spoken with the insurer, I would want to know what questions were asked and what you said. Later medical developments can also explain why an earlier description of your injuries was incomplete. For example, symptoms may worsen, or diagnostic testing may reveal an injury that was not known at the time of the first telephone call. The important point is to avoid guessing or trying to recreate answers from memory if questions later arise about what was said.
The insurer may consider your recorded answers when deciding whether you share responsibility. Illinois comparative negligence law allows compensation to be reduced when an injured person bears part of the fault, and recovery is generally barred when the plaintiff’s contributory fault exceeds 50 percent of the proximate cause of the injury. This gives insurers a reason to examine statements concerning speed, distractions, braking, reaction time, and other driving behavior closely.
If the other driver’s insurance company is asking you for a recorded statement after a Schaumburg car accident, I can review the circumstances of the crash and help you understand how the request may affect your injury claim. Insurance adjusters often begin investigating liability and damages shortly after a collision, sometimes before an injured person knows how serious the medical consequences will be. I can also address issues involving comparative fault, medical records, prior injuries, lost income, and the documentation needed to support your damages.
If you were injured in a car accident and have questions about speaking with the other driver’s insurance carrier, call our Schaumburg car accident lawyer at SJ INJURY LAW at (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation. I can evaluate the claim, explain your options, and help protect your interests while the insurance company investigates the accident.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.