A motor vehicle collision can injure structures in the neck and back that many people have never heard of until pain begins interfering with everyday life. Facet joints are small joints located along the spine, and they help guide movement while providing stability between vertebrae. When a vehicle is struck from behind, from the side, or at an angle, rapid acceleration and deceleration can place substantial force on these joints.
In Schaumburg, crashes along busy roadways such as Golf Road, Higgins Road, Schaumburg Road, Roselle Road, Barrington Road, and nearby Route 53 can leave injured motorists dealing with persistent neck or lower-back pain long after vehicle damage has been repaired. When I evaluate a facet joint injury claim, I focus on the mechanism of the collision, the medical evidence, the progression of symptoms, the treatment required, and the effect the injury has had on the client’s work and daily life.
Medical literature recognizes that acceleration-deceleration trauma associated with whiplash can place stress on cervical facet joints and surrounding structures. Facet-related pain may become chronic in some patients following motor vehicle trauma. For an injured person, however, identifying the source of pain is only one part of the problem. The insurance company may question whether the accident caused the condition, whether the symptoms are related to degeneration, or whether the treatment being recommended is necessary.
Facet joints are paired joints located at the back of each vertebral level. They allow the spine to bend and rotate while helping prevent excessive movement. The joints are lined with cartilage and surrounded by a capsule containing nerve endings, which means irritation or injury can produce significant pain.
During a collision, the neck or lower back may be forced beyond its normal range of motion. Rear-end crashes are particularly associated with rapid extension and flexion of the cervical spine. Medical research describing whiplash mechanics notes that these forces can produce impaction and stress involving cervical facet joints as well as ligaments, discs, nerve roots, and surrounding muscles.
A facet joint injury does not always involve a fracture or dramatic structural damage that appears immediately on an X-ray. The joint capsule may be strained, inflamed, or otherwise irritated. That can make these claims more difficult because the injured person may experience substantial pain despite imaging that does not show a major fracture or disc rupture.
Facet joint injuries can produce symptoms that overlap with other spinal injuries. In the cervical spine, a person may experience neck pain, stiffness, reduced range of motion, headaches, or pain that spreads toward the shoulders and upper back. Some people describe pain that becomes worse when turning the head, extending the neck, or remaining in one position for an extended period.
Lumbar facet injuries may cause localized lower-back pain that becomes more noticeable when standing, twisting, bending backward, or changing positions. Pain may also extend into the buttocks or upper thighs depending on the location of the affected joint.
The symptoms can also evolve after the collision. Someone may initially feel generalized soreness and later develop more distinct neck or back pain. That progression is one reason I encourage injured clients to accurately report symptoms to their healthcare providers and follow through with recommended medical evaluations.
Unlike some fractures, facet joint pain may not be obvious on routine imaging. X-rays may help identify fractures, alignment problems, or degenerative changes, while MRI or CT imaging may provide additional information about surrounding spinal structures. However, imaging alone does not always establish whether a particular facet joint is the source of a patient’s pain.
Doctors may rely on the patient’s history, physical examination, pain pattern, range-of-motion testing, and response to treatment. In some cases, diagnostic medial branch blocks or other injections may be used to evaluate whether the facet joint is generating pain. Medical literature recognizes medial branch blocks as one method used in evaluating cervical facet pain.
From a legal perspective, this makes careful medical documentation especially important. The insurance carrier may focus heavily on imaging findings while giving less attention to clinical findings or diagnostic procedures that support the treating physician’s conclusions.
Facet joint claims often generate arguments about causation. An insurance company may claim that the pain is caused by arthritis, age-related degeneration, a prior injury, or another preexisting spinal condition.
That does not necessarily mean the accident did not cause compensable harm. A collision can aggravate a preexisting condition or turn a previously asymptomatic condition into a painful one. The central issue becomes whether the crash caused a new injury or materially aggravated an existing condition.
Insurers may also point to delayed treatment, gaps in care, or normal imaging results. I examine the complete medical history rather than allowing one isolated finding to define the claim. Treatment records, prior medical history, diagnostic testing, physician opinions, and the timing of symptoms can all help establish what changed after the collision.
Damages depend on how seriously the injury affects the person. Medical bills may include emergency treatment, doctor visits, imaging, physical therapy, injections, pain-management care, and other procedures. Future treatment may also need to be considered if symptoms are expected to continue.
Lost wages can become part of the claim when the injury prevents someone from working or limits the hours they can work. More severe cases may involve reduced earning capacity if chronic spinal pain affects the person’s ability to continue in the same occupation.
Pain and suffering, disability, and loss of normal life may also be relevant. Illinois law recognizes economic and non-economic damages in bodily injury actions, including damages associated with pain and suffering and disability.
Illinois follows a modified comparative negligence rule. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, an injured plaintiff may recover if the plaintiff’s contributory fault is not more than 50 percent of the proximate cause of the injury. Any recovery is reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the plaintiff. If the plaintiff is more than 50 percent responsible, recovery is barred.
This issue often arises when insurers argue that both drivers contributed to the collision. They may claim that the injured driver was speeding, following too closely, distracted, or failed to take evasive action.
Because a percentage of fault can directly reduce the amount recovered, I investigate the underlying crash as carefully as I investigate the medical injury.
Illinois generally provides a two-year limitations period for actions seeking damages for personal injuries. Under 735 ILCS 5/13-202, personal injury actions generally must be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues. Certain circumstances can affect deadlines, so waiting until the end of that period can create unnecessary risk.
Facet joint cases may require months of treatment before the long-term prognosis becomes clear. That does not mean the investigation should be delayed. Evidence from the collision can disappear while treatment continues. Surveillance video may be erased, witnesses may become harder to locate, and vehicles may be repaired or destroyed.
Preserving accident evidence early while allowing the medical picture to develop can be critical to presenting the claim accurately.
Yes. Motor vehicle collisions can subject the cervical and lumbar spine to rapid forces that strain joints, ligaments, muscles, discs, and surrounding tissues. Medical literature concerning whiplash injuries identifies the facet joints as structures that may be affected by acceleration-deceleration trauma. Rear-end crashes are a common mechanism, but side-impact and other collisions can also produce significant spinal forces. Whether a particular crash caused a facet injury depends on the accident mechanics, symptoms, medical history, examination findings, and other evidence.
Cervical facet pain may cause localized neck discomfort, stiffness, reduced motion, headaches, or pain extending toward the shoulders. Lumbar facet pain commonly affects the lower back and may become worse with extension, twisting, prolonged standing, or certain movements. The symptoms can resemble disc, muscle, or ligament injuries, which is why medical evaluation is important. A patient’s description of the pain pattern, examination findings, and response to diagnostic treatment can help physicians determine the likely source.
Not always. An MRI may identify arthritis, inflammation, disc abnormalities, or other spinal conditions, but imaging does not necessarily prove whether a facet joint is producing pain. Some people can have significant symptoms even when imaging does not reveal a dramatic structural injury. Doctors may use physical examination findings and diagnostic procedures such as medial branch blocks to help identify a facet joint as the pain generator. An insurance company’s claim that a normal or nonspecific MRI means there is no injury should therefore be evaluated in light of the complete medical record.
Potentially, yes. A preexisting degenerative condition does not automatically eliminate a personal injury claim. The relevant question is often whether the collision caused new symptoms or aggravated a condition that previously existed. If you had degenerative changes but were functioning normally before the crash and began requiring significant treatment afterward, that history may be important. I compare prior medical records with post-accident records to identify changes in symptoms, treatment, limitations, and medical findings.
Some accident-related symptoms become more noticeable hours or days after a collision. Adrenaline, generalized soreness, and inflammation can affect how a person initially feels. Delayed symptoms do not automatically mean that the injury is unrelated to the crash, but a significant delay in seeking care can give an insurer an argument about causation. If symptoms develop after a collision, accurately reporting when they began and how they progressed can help physicians document the medical history.
They can be. If a treating physician recommends injections because of accident-related facet pain, the cost and effect of that treatment may become part of the damages analysis. Diagnostic medial branch blocks may also help identify the source of pain. If treatment provides only temporary relief and additional injections or radiofrequency ablation are recommended, projected future treatment costs may also be relevant. The claim should reflect medically supported treatment rather than only the bills incurred immediately after the collision.
Facet joint injuries can be difficult for injured motorists because the pain may be significant even when initial imaging does not reveal an obvious fracture or major disc injury. Insurance carriers may attempt to attribute symptoms to degeneration, prior medical problems, or normal aging. I focus on the medical history, mechanism of the collision, diagnostic findings, course of treatment, and changes in your ability to work and carry out normal activities.
If you suffered a facet joint injury, chronic neck pain, lower-back pain, or another spinal injury after a motor vehicle collision, call our Schaumburg car wreck attorney at SJ INJURY LAW at (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation. I can review the accident, examine the medical issues affecting your claim, preserve available evidence, address insurance company arguments, and pursue compensation for the losses caused by the collision.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.