Getting hit by a car as a pedestrian can change your life, and many people wonder if they can still make a claim if they were not in a marked crosswalk. In Schaumburg, it’s common for people to cross streets near shopping centers, restaurants, offices, apartments, parking lots, transit stops, and busy roads where the nearest crosswalk might be far away. Illinois law does set rules for pedestrians crossing outside crosswalks, but doing so does not automatically stop you from getting compensation.
What really matters are the details of the accident, like where you crossed, how visible you were, the driver’s speed, whether the driver was distracted, and if the driver had enough time to see and avoid you. When I review a pedestrian accident claim, I look at what both the pedestrian and the driver did, not just where the crossing happened.
Illinois law distinguishes between pedestrians crossing within crosswalks and those crossing elsewhere. Under 625 ILCS 5/11-1003, a pedestrian crossing a roadway outside a marked crosswalk or an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection generally must yield the right-of-way to vehicles already on the roadway. The statute also restricts pedestrians from crossing between adjacent signal-controlled intersections except within a marked crosswalk.
This rule matters, but it does not mean drivers can ignore pedestrians who are clearly visible in the road. Who is at fault still depends on whether someone was careless or caused the accident. I look at whether the driver was speeding, distracted by a phone, impaired, not paying attention, or driving in a way that made it hard to react to the pedestrian.
Pedestrians who cross outside crosswalks do need to yield, but drivers have responsibilities too. Drivers must be careful and pay attention to the situation. If a pedestrian is visible and the driver has enough time and space to react, just saying the pedestrian was not in a crosswalk may not settle who is at fault.
For example, imagine a driver going through a busy area in Schaumburg and seeing a pedestrian crossing ahead. If the driver is speeding or distracted and does not slow down even though there is enough time to react, the driver’s actions could still be a major reason for the accident.
Pedestrian accidents often involve both sides blaming each other. The insurance company might say the pedestrian crossed the street the wrong way, while the injured person might say the driver could have avoided the crash. I look at all the evidence to figure out how much fault, if any, belongs to each person.
Illinois follows a modified comparative negligence system. Under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116, an injured person is generally barred from recovering damages if that person’s contributory fault is more than 50 percent of the proximate cause of the injury. If the injured person is 50 percent or less at fault, compensation may still be recovered, but the amount is reduced according to the percentage of fault assigned.
This rule is especially important for cases where the pedestrian was not in a crosswalk. An insurance company might say the pedestrian was partly at fault for crossing where cars had the right-of-way. But that does not automatically end the claim.
For example, if a pedestrian is found 30 percent at fault and the driver 70 percent at fault, the pedestrian’s compensation would be reduced by 30 percent instead of being denied completely. How fault is divided can have a big impact on the money you receive, especially if the injuries are serious.
Evidence collected soon after a pedestrian accident is often very important. When I can, I look for video from nearby businesses, traffic cameras, dash cams, parking lot cameras, apartment buildings, or homes.
Witness statements can help show how quickly the pedestrian entered the street, if the driver was speeding, or if the driver seemed distracted. Physical evidence like skid marks, damage to the car, where the impact happened, debris, and where the pedestrian ended up can also help explain what happened.
Cell phone records, data from the car, and police reports can be important if there are questions about distraction or speed. The more serious the injury, the more important it is to save this evidence before it is lost.
Pedestrians have very little protection if they are hit by a car. Even accidents at lower speeds can cause serious injuries because the pedestrian takes most of the impact.
I commonly see pedestrian claims involving traumatic bI often handle pedestrian cases with injuries like traumatic brain injuries, concussions, broken legs, pelvic fractures, spinal and shoulder injuries, internal bleeding, facial injuries, nerve damage, and lasting mobility problems. Some people need surgery, long rehab, assistive devices, or ongoing medical care.return to the same job or may need long-term help with everyday activities. When that happens, the injury claim may involve future medical expenses, lost earning capacity, disability, pain and suffering, and other significant losses.
Insurance companies often focus heavily on the fact that a pedestrian was outside a marked crosswalk. That fact matters, but it should not automatically end the analysis.
I look at visibility, lighting, weather, roadway design, speed limits, the driver’s attention, the pedestrian’s movements, nearby intersections, the presence of traffic controls, and whether the driver had a realistic opportunity to avoid the collision. A pedestrian who crossed outside a crosswalk may bear some responsibility while still having a valid claim against a negligent driver.
That is why these cases should be evaluated based on the entire sequence of events rather than one fact in isolation.
Possibly. Crossing outside a crosswalk may violate Illinois pedestrian right-of-way rules depending on where and how the crossing occurred, but it does not automatically bar an injury claim. Illinois comparative-fault law allows an injured person to recover when that person’s fault is not more than 50 percent of the proximate cause, although compensation can be reduced according to the assigned percentage of fault. I would examine whether the driver was speeding, distracted, impaired, or had enough time to see and avoid you.
That can become a central factual dispute. Illinois law provides protections to drivers when a pedestrian suddenly enters the path of a vehicle so close that the driver cannot reasonably stop, and the state’s crosswalk statute expressly addresses pedestrians entering into an immediate hazard. I would look for video footage, witnesses, braking evidence, vehicle speed, roadway visibility, and the driver’s own statements to determine whether the collision was truly unavoidable.
Yes. Illinois law contains specific restrictions on where pedestrians may cross, particularly between adjacent intersections controlled by traffic signals. The availability and location of a marked crosswalk may affect the comparative-fault analysis, but it is still necessary to examine what the driver did before impact.
Speed can materially affect liability. A speeding driver has less time to react and may need considerably more distance to stop. If excessive speed contributed to the collision, that evidence may shift a greater share of responsibility to the driver. I may review electronic vehicle data, surveillance footage, witness observations, police measurements, and accident reconstruction evidence when speed is contested.
Nighttime conditions do not automatically prevent recovery. Lighting, clothing, headlights, streetlights, sight distance, weather, and the driver’s speed and attention all matter. An insurance company may argue that the pedestrian was difficult to see, while other evidence may show that the driver should have observed the pedestrian sooner. Each case depends on its specific facts.
Depending on the severity of the injuries and the circumstances of the collision, damages may include medical expenses, future medical treatment, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, and other losses. Serious pedestrian injuries can create long-term financial consequences, so I consider both current and future damages when evaluating the claim.
I recommend being careful before giving a recorded statement to the other driver’s insurer. The adjuster may ask detailed questions about where you crossed, how quickly you entered the roadway, whether you saw the vehicle, and whether you were distracted. Those answers may later be used to increase your assigned percentage of fault. Understanding the legal issues before providing a detailed statement can help protect the claim.
If you were struck by a vehicle while crossing outside a marked crosswalk, do not assume that you have no right to compensation. Illinois law allows fault to be divided between the people involved, and a pedestrian may still have a valid claim even when the pedestrian was partially responsible for the collision.
At SJ Injury Law, I represent people injured in pedestrian and motor vehicle accidents throughout Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, Des Plaines, Mount Prospect, Northbrook, Palatine, Prospect Heights, Wheeling, Park Ridge, Rosemont, Glenview, Chicago, and throughout Illinois.
If you were hit by a car and the insurance company is arguing that you were outside the crosswalk, Contact our Schaumburg pedestrian accident attorney at SJ INJURY LAW by calling (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation. I can review the location of the collision, evaluate the driver’s actions, examine comparative-fault issues, preserve available evidence, and determine what compensation may be available under Illinois law.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.