A collision involving a commercial truck in Schaumburg can raise questions that go far beyond whether the truck driver made a mistake behind the wheel. With Interstate 90, Route 53, Golf Road, Higgins Road, and other heavily traveled routes carrying commercial traffic through Schaumburg and the surrounding northwest suburbs, residents regularly share the road with tractor-trailers, delivery trucks, and other large commercial vehicles.
When a truck driver causes a serious crash, I want to know not only what the driver did, but why that person was driving the truck in the first place. If a trucking company hired or kept a driver despite warning signs showing that the driver posed a danger to the public, the company itself may potentially face liability under Illinois law. These cases can involve evidence concerning driving records, prior crashes, license problems, safety violations, employment history, drug and alcohol testing, and the company’s own hiring practices.
Illinois law recognizes claims against employers that negligently hire or retain employees who present a foreseeable danger to others. The Illinois Supreme Court explained in Van Horne v. Muller that a plaintiff pursuing negligent hiring or retention generally must show that the employer knew or should have known about a particular unfitness that created a danger, that the unfitness existed when the employee was hired or retained, and that it caused the plaintiff’s injury.
This principle is especially important in trucking accidents. Commercial trucks are much heavier than regular cars. If a company hires someone with a known history of unsafe driving, it puts people in Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, Palatine, Rolling Meadows, and nearby areas at serious risk.
When I investigate whether a trucking company negligently hired an unsafe driver, I look for information the company discovered or reasonably should have discovered before allowing the person to operate a commercial vehicle.
This can include past preventable accidents, repeated speeding tickets, reckless driving convictions, license suspensions, earlier commercial driving violations, failed or refused drug or alcohol tests, false job information, or a pattern of breaking federal safety rules. A company does not need to hire only drivers with perfect records, but serious or repeated safety issues become important if they are connected to the crash.
Timing is important too. If a safety problem existed before the driver was hired, it may support a negligent hiring claim. If dangerous behavior is found out later, it may lead to claims of negligent retention or supervision.
Commercial trucking companies must follow strict federal rules about driver qualifications and safety. Depending on the company and the type of work, these rules can affect qualification files, licenses, background checks, medical requirements, driving history, and other safety information.
I often compare the company’s records to the rules that apply to that company and driver. Missing paperwork, incomplete checks, ignored warning signs, or differences between a driver’s real history and the company’s records can be important evidence.
Breaking a federal rule does not automatically prove every part of a negligence claim in Illinois. Still, safety records and whether the company followed the rules can show what the company knew, what information they had, and if they acted reasonably when letting the driver work.
Sometimes a trucking company does not learn about a driver’s dangerous behavior until after the person has been hired. If the company then continues allowing that driver to operate commercial vehicles despite serious safety concerns, negligent retention may become an issue.
Illinois courts recognize negligent retention along with negligent hiring. The focus is generally on whether the employer knew or should have known about a particular unfitness that created a danger to third parties and whether that unfitness caused the injury.
For example, a commercial driver may accumulate crashes, moving violations, hours-of-service violations, complaints, or other safety problems while employed. If management knows about serious recurring misconduct but continues sending the driver onto Illinois roads, those decisions deserve close examination after a serious collision.
A negligent hiring claim is not always the only potential claim against a trucking company. Depending on the facts, there may also be allegations involving negligent training, negligent supervision, negligent retention, improper vehicle maintenance, unsafe scheduling practices, or other conduct by the company.
A company may also face vicarious liability for negligent conduct committed by an employee acting within the scope of employment. Negligent hiring is different because it focuses on the company’s own conduct in selecting or retaining the driver rather than only on the driver’s actions.
This distinction can become important when evidence shows that company management made independent safety decisions that contributed to the collision.
Commercial trucking cases can involve far more records than ordinary passenger-vehicle accidents. Driver qualification files, applications, motor vehicle records, disciplinary documents, training records, electronic logging data, crash histories, internal emails, safety reports, drug and alcohol records, and other company documents may become important.
I also look at electronic data from the truck, dash camera footage, surveillance video, police reports, witness statements, photographs, cargo records, maintenance information, and communications between the driver and dispatcher.
Obtaining and preserving this evidence early can help establish whether the crash resulted from an isolated mistake or whether the trucking company ignored signs that the driver should not have been operating a commercial vehicle.
When negligent hiring contributes to a collision, an injured person may seek compensation for losses caused by the crash. Depending on the circumstances, those losses can include medical bills, future treatment, lost earnings, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, and other legally recoverable damages.
Illinois also uses modified comparative negligence under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. If an injured person is more than 50 percent responsible for the harm, recovery can be barred. If the person’s share of fault is 50 percent or less, damages may be reduced according to that percentage of fault. Illinois courts have applied this statutory comparative-fault framework in negligence actions.
There is no single factor that automatically establishes that a commercial driver was unsafe to hire. The issue generally depends on the driver’s history, the requirements of the position, what the trucking company knew or should have known, and whether the problem relates to the later collision.
Repeated serious moving violations, prior preventable crashes, license suspensions, substance-related driving problems, disqualifying commercial driving issues, or a pattern of safety violations could all warrant examination. The stronger the connection between the prior warning signs and the conduct that caused the accident, the more significant that history may become.
A negligent hiring investigation can involve employment applications, driver qualification files, driving records, background investigations, previous employment information, safety reviews, training documents, disciplinary records, and communications among company personnel.
Formal litigation procedures may also allow relevant documents and testimony to be obtained from the trucking company and other parties. I may compare those records with information available from government agencies, previous employers, crash records, and other sources to determine whether the company missed or ignored information concerning the driver’s safety history.
A company may argue that management did not actually know about the driver’s prior safety problems. Illinois negligent hiring law, however, is not limited only to information an employer admits knowing.
The question may also involve what the employer reasonably should have known when hiring or retaining the employee. Illinois courts describe negligent hiring and retention in terms of an employer that knew or should have known about the employee’s particular unfitness. If appropriate investigation would have uncovered significant safety information, the company’s hiring procedures may become a major issue.
Yes, depending on the evidence. Negligent retention addresses situations in which an employer continues employing someone after learning, or after circumstances suggest it should have learned, that the employee presents a particular danger.
A driver might accumulate serious violations, preventable accidents, safety complaints, or other problems after being hired. I would examine whether company personnel were aware of those events, how they responded, whether additional training or discipline occurred, and why the driver was allowed to continue operating commercial vehicles.
When a commercial truck causes a serious collision, I believe the investigation should extend beyond the driver’s conduct at the scene. If a trucking company hired someone despite serious warning signs, failed to investigate the driver’s background properly, or continued employing a driver after learning about dangerous conduct, the company’s decisions may become an important part of the injury claim.
SJ INJURY LAW represents people injured in truck and vehicle accidents throughout Schaumburg, Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, Des Plaines, Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect, Northbrook, Palatine, Rolling Meadows, Prospect Heights, Wheeling, Park Ridge, Rosemont, Glenview, Chicago, and communities throughout Illinois.
If you were injured in a collision involving a commercial truck or unsafe commercial driver, contact SJ INJURY LAW, a Schaumburg car accident attorney, to discuss the circumstances of your case and the parties that may be legally responsible. Contact our Schaumburg truck accident attorney at SJ INJURY LAW by calling (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.