Every day in Schaumburg, parking lots are busy with drivers backing out of spaces while pedestrians walk between cars, carry groceries, push carts, help children, or head back to their vehicles. Places like shopping centers, restaurants, offices, apartments, and hotels all see regular interaction between cars and people on foot. If a driver backs up without checking behind them, they can hit a pedestrian with little warning. Even at low speeds, these accidents can cause serious injuries like fractures, head or spinal injuries, and internal trauma. When I help someone hurt in this kind of accident, I carefully review what both the driver and pedestrian were doing, check for surveillance footage, and look for other evidence to understand how the crash happened.
Backover accidents happen in many places, not just Schaumburg. They also occur in busy parking lots in Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, Des Plaines, Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect, Palatine, Rolling Meadows, and nearby suburbs. These cases can become complicated because drivers and insurance companies may claim the pedestrian suddenly walked behind the car. That’s why it’s important to look at all the facts, not just the driver’s story, when deciding who is at fault.
Most backover accidents happen when a driver does not check that the area behind their car is clear before reversing. Distractions like phones, conversations, navigation systems, children in the car, or nearby traffic can take a driver’s attention away. Some drivers only glance in one direction and start backing up without checking their mirrors or looking behind them the whole time.
Many newer cars have backup cameras and sensors, but these features do not replace the need for drivers to stay alert. Cameras can have blind spots, get blocked by dirt or bad weather, or miss someone walking in from the side. Drivers still need to look around carefully and be ready to stop.
Bigger vehicles like SUVs, pickup trucks, vans, and commercial vehicles can be even more dangerous because they have large blind spots right behind them. It can be especially hard for a distracted driver to see young children or shorter pedestrians.
Parking lots often have things that block your view, like parked SUVs, delivery trucks, landscaping, shopping cart areas, pillars, and other structures. These obstacles make it even more important for drivers to be careful.
Illinois law expressly requires drivers to exercise due care to avoid colliding with pedestrians. Section 11-1003.1 of the Illinois Vehicle Code, 625 ILCS 5/11-1003.1, provides that every driver must exercise due care to avoid striking a pedestrian and must take proper precautions when observing children or individuals who may be incapacitated or confused.
That duty is highly relevant in a parking lot backover claim. A driver cannot simply place the vehicle in reverse and assume that nobody is behind it. I examine whether the driver checked mirrors, looked over their shoulder, used an available backup camera, backed slowly, responded to warnings, and kept watching the area while the vehicle was moving.
The exact circumstances matter. A driver backing from a space near a grocery store entrance should reasonably anticipate pedestrians. The same is true near shopping cart returns, restaurants, schools, apartment complexes, medical offices, and other locations where foot traffic is common.
A violation of a traffic rule does not automatically decide every civil claim, but driver conduct and applicable safety rules can provide important evidence when determining whether reasonable care was exercised.
The backing driver is often primarily responsible when they move into a pedestrian’s path without making sure it is safe to do so. However, every accident must be evaluated based on its own facts.
I investigate where the pedestrian was located before impact, how long the pedestrian had been visible, whether the vehicle’s reverse lights were illuminated, whether the driver stopped before backing, and whether witnesses saw what occurred. Surveillance footage can be particularly important because many retail centers and commercial properties have cameras facing parking areas.
The insurance company may claim that the pedestrian suddenly walked behind the vehicle. That argument does not necessarily eliminate the driver’s responsibility. A driver backing through an area where pedestrians are reasonably expected must remain alert throughout the maneuver.
In some cases, both parties may be assigned a percentage of fault. Illinois uses a modified comparative fault system under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. A plaintiff whose fault is 50 percent or less may still recover damages, although the award is reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff. A person found more than 50 percent responsible is barred from recovery under that statute.
That makes evidence particularly important when an insurer tries to shift responsibility to the injured pedestrian.
Backover accidents can be especially dangerous for children. A child walking behind an SUV or pickup truck may be below the driver’s direct line of sight. Children may also move unpredictably in parking areas and may not appreciate that a vehicle is about to reverse.
Illinois law specifically instructs drivers to exercise proper precaution when observing children. A driver in a location where families are frequently present should be especially careful before moving a vehicle.
Older adults are also vulnerable because a low-speed collision can cause severe injuries. A fall caused by a reversing vehicle may lead to a hip fracture, pelvic fracture, head injury, or shoulder injury. Preexisting osteoporosis or degenerative conditions can make the physical consequences even more serious.
An insurance company may attempt to attribute some of an older person’s medical problems to age or preexisting conditions. I focus on whether the collision caused a new injury or aggravated an existing condition, because an accident does not have to create a completely new medical problem to result in compensable harm.
A pedestrian has almost no physical protection when struck by a vehicle. Even a vehicle moving only a few miles per hour can knock someone to the pavement or pin the person against another vehicle, curb, wall, shopping cart, or fixed object.
Backover accident injuries may include broken hips, pelvic fractures, leg fractures, ankle injuries, wrist fractures, shoulder injuries, traumatic brain injuries, concussions, spinal injuries, torn ligaments, internal injuries, and significant cuts or bruising. Some victims require surgery, inpatient treatment, physical therapy, assistive devices, or extended rehabilitation.
The injuries can become even more severe if the vehicle continues reversing after the initial impact. A pedestrian may be knocked down and then partially run over, creating crush injuries or catastrophic orthopedic trauma.
When evaluating damages, I consider not only the initial emergency room treatment but also the entire medical course. Future care, permanent impairment, reduced mobility, chronic pain, lost earning capacity, and changes in daily activities can all affect the value of a claim.
Parking lot accident claims often involve conflicting stories. The driver may say the pedestrian appeared suddenly. The pedestrian may remember only seeing the vehicle moments before impact. Witnesses may have observed only part of the incident.
Surveillance footage can help resolve those disputes. Shopping centers, grocery stores, restaurants, hotels, office buildings, apartment complexes, banks, and other businesses frequently operate security cameras that record parking areas.
That footage may show when the pedestrian entered the area, how quickly the vehicle was backing, whether the driver paused before reversing, whether brake lights illuminated, and whether surrounding conditions obstructed visibility.
The challenge is that businesses do not necessarily preserve video indefinitely. Some security systems automatically record over older footage. For that reason, identifying potential camera locations and requesting preservation as quickly as possible can be extremely important.
Video is only one form of evidence. Photographs of the accident scene can document parking space configuration, sight lines, vehicle positioning, lighting conditions, and potential obstructions.
Vehicle data can sometimes provide additional information. Modern automobiles may contain systems that record information associated with braking, speed, or other vehicle operations. Backup cameras, sensors, and collision-warning systems may also become relevant depending on the particular vehicle.
Witness statements matter as well. Other shoppers, employees, passengers, or nearby drivers may have seen the vehicle reverse or heard the pedestrian yell before impact.
I also review the police report, photographs of the injuries, medical records, property damage, and available insurance information. When a commercial driver or company vehicle is involved, additional employer records and business insurance policies may become relevant.
Most parking lot backover claims focus on the negligent driver, but certain accidents may involve additional issues concerning the property itself.
For example, poor lighting, badly designed traffic patterns, blocked pedestrian walkways, obstructed sight lines, missing signs, defective pavement markings, or dangerous parking configurations may contribute to an accident. Whether a property owner has legal responsibility depends heavily on the particular circumstances and whether a dangerous condition contributed to the collision.
I do not assume that every parking lot accident creates a premises liability claim. Instead, I examine whether there is credible evidence that a property condition played an actual role in causing the injury.
When multiple parties may share responsibility, identifying all potential defendants can be important because serious pedestrian injuries may create substantial medical and financial losses.
A pedestrian injured by a backing vehicle may be entitled to pursue compensation for losses caused by the collision. Depending on the circumstances, damages may include emergency treatment, hospitalization, surgery, diagnostic imaging, rehabilitation, physical therapy, prescription expenses, future treatment, and other medical costs.
Lost wages may also be recoverable when injuries prevent the victim from working. A serious injury that permanently limits employment may support a claim for diminished future earning capacity.
Illinois law also recognizes non-economic damages. These can include pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, and other intangible losses associated with a serious injury.
The appropriate value of a claim depends on medical evidence, the duration of recovery, whether the condition becomes permanent, the strength of the liability evidence, and the effect of the injuries on the person’s work and daily life.
Evidence rarely improves with time. Surveillance footage can be erased, witnesses can become difficult to locate, vehicles can be repaired, and people can forget important details.
Illinois generally requires actions for personal injury damages to be filed within two years after the cause of action accrues under 735 ILCS 5/13-202. Exceptions and different deadlines can apply in certain situations, so I do not recommend treating the general two-year period as permission to wait.
The practical deadline for preserving evidence can be much shorter than the legal filing deadline. A security recording might disappear within days or weeks.
Taking action promptly gives me a better opportunity to investigate how the accident happened and preserve evidence before it is lost.
If a driver backed into you or a loved one in a parking lot, I can investigate how the collision occurred, preserve available evidence, identify applicable insurance coverage, and pursue compensation from the responsible party. Backover accidents can produce serious injuries even when the vehicle was traveling at a low speed, and insurance companies may attempt to minimize the injuries or shift responsibility to the pedestrian.
At SJ Injury Law, I represent people injured in pedestrian accidents, parking lot collisions, car accidents, truck accidents, rideshare crashes, motorcycle accidents, bicycle accidents, and other incidents caused by negligence. I understand how important surveillance footage, witness accounts, medical documentation, and careful liability analysis can become when a driver disputes responsibility.
Call our Schaumburg car accident lawyer at SJ INJURY LAW at (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation. I serve injured clients throughout Schaumburg, Chicago, the northwest suburbs, and communities across Illinois.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.