No one expects a trip to Walmart to end with being hit by falling merchandise. However, big stores often keep large amounts of inventory above shopping areas, so if items are not secured properly, they can pose real safety risks. In Schaumburg and across Chicago, falling boxes, TVs, appliances, furniture, or other heavy products can cause injuries that may need emergency care, surgery, rehab, and time off work.
When I look into these injuries, I focus on why the item fell, who put it there, whether employees knew about the risk, and if the store used safe stocking and inspection practices. These cases often involve Illinois premises liability law, negligence, company safety rules, video footage, employee statements, and details about how items were stacked or displayed.
Schaumburg is a popular shopping spot for people from the northwest suburbs, including Arlington Heights, Palatine, Rolling Meadows, Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect, Buffalo Grove, and nearby areas. Big stores here are busy, with merchandise always being moved, stocked, or rearranged. If these activities create a dangerous situation and someone gets hurt, I look at whether the store failed to act with reasonable care and if that led to the injury.
Even a product that is not very heavy can cause serious injuries if it falls from a height and hits someone without warning. Shoppers walking through an aisle often have no chance to protect their head, neck, shoulders, or face before being struck. If heavier items are stored above, the risks are even greater.
I often see injuries like concussions, traumatic brain injuries, neck and shoulder injuries, facial fractures, broken arms, wrist injuries, back injuries, and cuts that need stitches. Sometimes, a customer falls after being hit, which can lead to a second injury from hitting the floor or shelves. This can cause hip fractures, knee injuries, spinal injuries, or more head trauma.
Some symptoms take time to appear. At first, a shopper might just feel sore, but later develop headaches, neck pain, numbness, dizziness, memory issues, shoulder weakness, or back pain. Because of this, having good medical records is important if the insurance company later questions whether the injury was caused by the falling merchandise.
A falling product does not automatically establish that Walmart or another retailer is legally responsible. I must examine the circumstances and determine whether negligence contributed to the accident.
Under the Illinois Premises Liability Act, 740 ILCS 130/2, an owner or occupier of property owes lawful entrants a duty of reasonable care under the circumstances regarding the condition of the premises and acts done or omitted on the property. For a retail customer injured by falling merchandise, the central issue is often whether the store created an unreasonable danger or knew, or reasonably should have known, about a condition requiring correction.
For example, liability may become an issue when merchandise was stacked too high, improperly balanced, placed on damaged shelving, inadequately secured, or stored in a manner that allowed products to fall into an aisle. I may also investigate whether employees used improper stocking procedures, whether another employee had previously noticed unstable merchandise, or whether similar problems had been reported before the accident.
The specific facts matter. My objective is to determine exactly how the merchandise came to be in a position where it could fall onto a customer.
High-volume retailers need to replenish merchandise constantly. Employees may stock shelves during business hours while customers are moving through the same aisles. Products may also be stored on upper shelving above the merchandise customers can directly access.
Problems can arise when products are stacked unevenly or too close to the edge of shelving. Boxes can become unstable when heavier merchandise is placed on top of lighter merchandise or when packaging becomes damaged. Merchandise may also shift after customers remove neighboring products.
I investigate whether the storage method itself created the danger. If employees placed merchandise in an unstable configuration that eventually resulted in a falling object, evidence concerning those stocking practices can become central to establishing negligence.
Photographs taken shortly after an accident can be extremely useful because store employees may quickly remove, restack, or rearrange merchandise after someone is hurt.
Some falling merchandise accidents occur while employees are actively stocking or retrieving products. An employee operating a ladder, stocking cart, pallet jack, lift device, or other equipment may accidentally dislodge merchandise from overhead storage.
Other accidents happen shortly after stocking has been completed. A box that appears stable for several minutes may eventually shift and fall after an employee leaves the area.
When I handle one of these claims, I want to know which employees were working in that department, when the merchandise was stocked, whether an employee inspected the area afterward, and whether company procedures were followed. Staffing schedules, internal reports, employee statements, and surveillance recordings can help answer these questions.
A retailer may be responsible for negligent acts performed by employees within the scope of their employment. Therefore, identifying what store employees were doing immediately before the accident can be just as important as examining the merchandise itself.
Walmart and other large retailers commonly operate substantial video surveillance systems. Depending upon camera placement, recordings may show the aisle before the accident, employee activity, the merchandise falling, the customer’s location, and what employees did immediately afterward.
The minutes or hours before the accident may be particularly important. A recording might show an employee stocking the shelf, another customer handling the merchandise, an employee observing a dangerous condition, or merchandise becoming progressively unstable before it eventually fell.
I do not want potentially useful recordings lost through routine video-retention practices. When appropriate, prompt written notice can be used to request preservation of relevant evidence. The preservation request may extend beyond the few seconds showing the impact because footage from earlier in the day could help establish how the dangerous condition developed.
The same principle applies to photographs, inspection records, incident reports, stocking documents, and other electronically stored information.
After a serious falling merchandise accident, store management may prepare an incident report. Employees may photograph the area, speak with witnesses, record statements, identify the product involved, or document the condition of the shelving.
I advise injured customers to report the accident before leaving whenever their medical condition allows them to do so. Reporting establishes that the incident occurred and gives the store an opportunity to document the scene.
However, I would be cautious about providing extensive recorded statements to representatives of the company’s insurance carrier before understanding the purpose of the questions. An insurance representative may ask questions designed to determine whether another explanation can be given for the accident or whether some portion of responsibility can be assigned to the injured customer.
Retailers may argue that another shopper moved, disturbed, or improperly returned merchandise shortly before an accident. That issue does not necessarily end an injury claim, but it can make the investigation more complicated.
I would examine how long the condition existed and whether store employees had a reasonable opportunity to discover it. I would also investigate whether the store’s merchandising system made unstable merchandise foreseeable in an area where customers were expected to select and remove products themselves.
Surveillance recordings can become particularly valuable in this situation. Video might establish whether another customer created the condition only seconds before the accident or whether unstable merchandise remained unattended for a substantially longer period.
The length of time a condition existed is often important when determining whether a retailer reasonably should have discovered and corrected it.
Retail defendants and their insurance carriers may contend that the injured person contributed to an accident. The company might argue that a customer pulled merchandise from an unstable stack, attempted to reach merchandise stored overhead, ignored a warning, or otherwise contributed to the event.
Illinois follows modified comparative fault under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. A plaintiff who is more than 50 percent responsible for causing the injury is barred from recovery. When the plaintiff’s fault is 50 percent or less, compensation may still be recovered, but the damages are reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to the plaintiff.
This makes accurate evidence especially important. Surveillance video, witness testimony, merchandise placement, shelving configuration, and photographs can help establish what the customer actually did rather than relying on assumptions made after the accident.
The damages available depend on the nature of the injury and its effect on the person’s life. I evaluate both the immediate financial losses and the longer-term consequences.
Medical damages can include emergency room treatment, diagnostic imaging, physician visits, physical therapy, surgery, prescription medication, rehabilitation, and reasonably anticipated future treatment. An injury that prevents someone from working may also support a claim for past lost wages and, when appropriate, diminished future earning capacity.
Pain, disability, disfigurement, loss of normal life, and other non-economic consequences may also be significant. A traumatic brain injury or spinal injury can affect a person’s ability to work, sleep, drive, exercise, care for children, and perform ordinary activities long after the initial medical bills have been incurred.
I therefore avoid evaluating a falling merchandise claim solely according to the cost of the first emergency room visit.
Illinois generally requires an action for personal injuries to be commenced within two years after the cause of action accrues under 735 ILCS 5/13-202. There can be exceptions and different deadlines in certain circumstances, so I evaluate the applicable limitation period based on the particular facts rather than assuming every claim follows precisely the same timeline.
The practical deadline for preserving evidence can be much shorter. Surveillance recordings can be overwritten. Displays can be changed. Merchandise can be moved. Employees can leave their jobs, and witnesses can become difficult to locate.
For those reasons, I prefer to investigate a significant falling merchandise accident while evidence is still available and memories remain fresh.
If merchandise fell from a shelf, overhead storage rack, pallet, store display, or stocking area and injured you, I can investigate whether unsafe merchandise placement, employee conduct, inadequate inspections, or another preventable condition contributed to your accident. These claims may require quick action to preserve surveillance recordings, photographs, incident documentation, witness information, and internal records before important evidence becomes unavailable.
If you or a family member was injured by falling merchandise at Walmart or another retail store, contact our Schaumburg personal injury law attorney at SJ INJURY LAW by calling (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation. I can review what happened, identify evidence that should be preserved, determine the parties that may be legally responsible, and explain the options available for pursuing compensation under Illinois law.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.