Electric bicycles are now a common sight in Schaumburg and nearby suburbs, used for everything from commuting to recreation. You’ll see riders near shopping areas, neighborhoods, parks, and busy roads in places like Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove, Des Plaines, Elk Grove Village, Mount Prospect, Palatine, and Rolling Meadows. While e-bikes look like regular bicycles, their electric motors let riders go much faster, which can make accidents with cars or trucks more serious. E-bike riders have little protection in a crash, so even a low-speed accident can cause broken bones, brain or spinal injuries, internal harm, or lasting disabilities. When I help someone after an e-bicycle accident, I start by figuring out how the crash happened, what traffic laws were involved, and who was at fault.
Illinois law sets out specific rules for low-speed electric bicycles, including where and how they can be used. These rules are important if an insurance company tries to blame the rider for a crash. Still, breaking a traffic rule does not automatically mean you lose your right to a personal injury claim. Who is responsible depends on the whole situation, including what the driver, the rider, and sometimes others did.
Illinois distinguishes qualifying low-speed electric bicycles from mopeds and motor-driven cycles. Under 625 ILCS 5/1-140.10, a low-speed electric bicycle must have operable pedals and an electric motor of less than 750 watts. Illinois divides these bicycles into three classes.
A Class 1 e-bike provides motor assistance only while the rider is pedaling and stops assisting when the bicycle reaches 20 miles per hour. A Class 2 e-bike can use its motor to propel the bicycle without pedaling, but motor assistance stops at 20 miles per hour. A Class 3 e-bike provides pedal assistance up to 28 miles per hour. Illinois law expressly states that qualifying low-speed electric bicycles are not mopeds or motor-driven cycles.
These differences are important after an accident because insurance companies often look into what kind of bike was involved, how powerful its motor was, whether it was modified, and where it was being used.
Under 625 ILCS 5/11-1517, Illinois generally applies the traffic provisions governing bicycles to low-speed electric bicycles. The statute permits qualifying e-bikes on highways, streets, and roadways where bicycles are authorized, including bicycle lanes. They may also be operated on bicycle paths unless the municipality, county, or other authority responsible for that path prohibits all e-bikes or particular classes of them. Illinois law generally prohibits operating a low-speed electric bicycle on a sidewalk. Class 3 e-bike operators must also be at least 16 years old, although a younger child can be a passenger on a Class 3 e-bike designed to carry passengers.
Local rules can play a big role in an accident claim. For example, a crash on a Schaumburg street might raise different questions than one on a park trail or recreational path.
I carefully review where the crash happened, the traffic controls, bike lane markings, signs, visibility, lighting, intersection layout, and any local rules before deciding how traffic laws affect the case.
A driver cannot avoid responsibility just by saying the e-bike rider was hard to see or going faster than expected. Drivers must always act reasonably and watch out for others on the road.
Many e-bicycle collisions occur when motorists make left turns across a rider’s path, turn right in front of a cyclist, enter a roadway from a driveway, fail to yield at an intersection, drift into a bicycle lane, or open a vehicle door into an approaching rider. Distracted driving can also be particularly dangerous because a driver looking at a phone for only a few seconds may completely fail to detect an approaching bicycle.
Arguments about visibility often come up in these cases. A driver might tell the insurance company that the rider “came out of nowhere.” I don’t take that at face value. Evidence like vehicle damage, road markings, witness statements, traffic or security cameras, photos, phone data, and crash reconstructions can show what really happened.
Intersections can be especially risky for e-bike riders. A driver turning left might see an e-bike coming but misjudge its speed. Since Class 3 e-bikes can help riders reach speeds close to 28 miles per hour, the gap between the rider and the intersection can close faster than drivers realize.
A crash can happen if a vehicle moves directly into the rider’s path. The rider might hit the side of the car, fall onto the road, or be thrown into another vehicle or object.
Right-turn crashes are another common risk. Sometimes a driver passes an e-bike and then quickly turns across the rider’s path. These are called right-hook collisions. Figuring out who is at fault often means looking closely at lane positions, turn signals, speeds, and what happened just before the crash.
E-bikes don’t offer much protection against the size and force of a car. A rider might take the first hit from the vehicle and then get hurt again when hitting the ground.
I commonly evaluate e-bike claims involving traumatic brain injuries, concussions, facial fractures, broken wrists, broken arms, shoulder injuries, pelvic fractures, hip fractures, leg fractures, spinal injuries, herniated discs, ligament injuries, internal bleeding, road rash, and permanent scarring.
Some injuries need surgery and long-term rehab. Others can keep someone from working for months or even make it impossible to do physical jobs again. Serious brain or spinal injuries might mean a lifetime of treatment, special care, mobility aids, home changes, and other big future costs.
For these reasons, I do not look only at the medical bills that exist immediately after the accident. A serious injury claim must account for the future consequences of the injury as well.
When another person’s negligence causes an e-bicycle accident, the injured rider may pursue compensation for losses attributable to the collision. The damages available depend on the facts of the case and the severity of the injuries.
A claim may include emergency medical treatment, hospitalization, diagnostic imaging, surgery, physical therapy, prescription costs, rehabilitation, follow-up treatment, and reasonably necessary future medical care. Lost income may also be recoverable when injuries prevent the victim from working.
When an injury permanently affects employment, I may also evaluate diminished earning capacity. Non-economic damages can include pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, and loss of a normal life when supported by the evidence.
The value of an e-bike claim therefore cannot be determined by simply adding medical bills together. The real question is how the injuries changed the person’s health, work, independence, daily activities, and future.
One of the most important parts of an e-bicycle accident claim is identifying all available insurance coverage. If a negligent driver strikes a rider, the driver’s automobile liability insurance may provide compensation.
Problems arise when the driver has insufficient insurance or no insurance at all. Depending on the circumstances and the applicable policy language, additional insurance coverage may need to be investigated.
Commercial vehicles create another layer of complexity. If an e-bike rider is struck by a delivery truck, rideshare vehicle, company vehicle, or other vehicle being used for business purposes, commercial insurance or an employer’s coverage may become relevant. I investigate coverage rather than assuming the insurance policy initially identified by the police is the only policy available.
Insurance companies frequently look for ways to shift fault onto cyclists. An adjuster may argue that the e-bike rider was traveling too fast, was difficult to see, entered the intersection improperly, failed to use lighting, rode outside an appropriate roadway position, or violated a rule governing electric bicycles.
Illinois uses a modified comparative negligence system under 735 ILCS 5/2-1116. An injured plaintiff who is more than 50 percent responsible for the injury is barred from recovering damages. If the plaintiff is 50 percent or less responsible, compensation can still be recovered, but the award is reduced according to the percentage of fault assigned to the plaintiff.
That makes allegations against an e-bike rider extremely important. A seemingly small factual dispute can have a substantial financial effect on the claim.
If an insurer argues that my client contributed to an accident, I examine whether the accusation is actually supported by evidence rather than simply accepting the adjuster’s characterization of the collision.
E-bike accidents can leave valuable forms of evidence that may disappear quickly. Photographs of the bicycle, vehicle damage, roadway markings, skid marks, traffic signals, sight lines, and debris can help establish how the crash happened.
Digital evidence may be equally valuable. Some e-bikes or connected devices may contain ride information, while phones, fitness applications, GPS devices, dash cameras, and nearby security cameras can sometimes help establish movement and timing.
Witness statements can also become critical when the motorist and cyclist give competing versions of events. Businesses near Schaumburg intersections or shopping areas may have security cameras that recorded the collision, but that footage may not be retained indefinitely. For that reason, I believe evidence preservation should begin as early as possible after a serious e-bicycle accident.
Illinois generally requires an action for personal injury to be commenced within two years after the claim accrues under 735 ILCS 5/13-202. Certain situations can involve different deadlines, however, particularly when governmental entities or other special circumstances are involved.
I do not recommend treating the statute of limitations as a reason to wait. Evidence can disappear long before the legal filing deadline expires. Witness memories fade, video can be deleted, physical conditions change, and vehicles or bicycles can be repaired or destroyed.
The earlier an accident is investigated, the greater the opportunity to preserve evidence explaining what actually happened.
When an e-bicycle rider is hit by a car, SUV, truck, delivery vehicle, or other motor vehicle, the injuries can change a person’s life in seconds. At SJ Injury Law, I investigate how the collision happened, identify the parties who may be responsible, examine available insurance coverage, preserve evidence, document the injuries, and challenge insurance company attempts to unfairly place fault on the injured rider. Serious e-bike cases deserve careful attention because medical treatment, lost income, permanent limitations, and future care needs can make the financial consequences substantial.
Contact our Schaumburg bicycle accident attorney at SJ INJURY LAW by calling (847) 434-3555 to receive your free consultation. I represent injured riders and families throughout Schaumburg, Chicago, the northwest suburbs, and communities across Illinois, and I can evaluate who may be responsible, what insurance may apply, and what compensation may be available after a serious e-bicycle accident.
Client injured by a distracted driver who was texting at the time…
Student was injured and fractured several bones and required surgery to…
While at work operating a piece of manufacturing equipment, the safety…
Woman was bitten on her face by what she believed to be a vicious…
Our client suffered a back injury and will undergo spine surgery…
Client's vehicle was forced into oncoming traffic, colliding with a semi-truck...
We are highly experienced personal injury lawyers. We know how to help accident victims receive the full financial compensation they deserve. Our Winning Team is focused, dedicated, and sensitive to each of our client's needs. We are here to help you 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.